Fullerton College Faculty Senate

 

Approved Minutes

March 30, 2006

 


 

Present

 

 

 

Business.........................................

Dale Craig

 

Counseling......................................

Elias Dominguez

 

Fine Arts.........................................

Chuck Ketter

 

Humanities......................................

Danielle Fouquette, John Ison,

Robert Lundergan, Miguel Powers, Jeff Rodine

 

Library.............................................

Michele Fitzsimmons

 

Math/Computer Science...................

Kelly Klassen, Deborah McQueen

 

Natural Sciences..............................

Jacob Sapiro

 

Part-Time Faculty.............................

Jim Book

 

Physical Education..........................

Jim Kiefer, Pete Snyder

 

Social Sciences...............................

Diana Kyle, Arienne Turner

 

Student Services..............................

Paul McKinley

 

Technology/Engineering....................

Gayle Cebrian, Dennis Howey

 

At-large...........................................

Elise Donley, Callista Lee, Mike Moore,

Sally Moore, Marcus Wilson

 

 

 

 

Associated Students........................

Jonathan Mayer

 

 

 

 

President.........................................

Joumana McGowan

 

Past President.................................

 

 

Secretary........................................

Jane Troop

 

Treasurer.........................................

Ken Collins

 

At-large, Curriculum Chair.................

Doug Eisner

 

 

 

Guests:  Peter Fong, Barbara Hollowell, Deborah Ludford, Nilo Niccolai

 

 

 

Absent

 

 

 

Business/CIS...................................

Joel Willenbring

 

Counseling......................................

Karyn Nguyen

 

Fine Arts.........................................

Bill Hayner

 

Natural Sciences..............................

Jeff Feaster

 

Part-time.........................................

Jim Book

 

Senate Exec...................................................... R

Rolando Sanabria

 

Social Sciences...............................

Susan Grabiel

 

Technology......................................

Kevin Sampson

 

I.                     CALL TO ORDER

The meeting was called to order at 3 p.m. by President Joumana McGowan.

 

II.                   APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING

M/S/U (Lee/McQueen) to approve the Minutes of the March 16, 2006 meeting.

 

III.                  APPROVAL OF AGENDA

 

M/S/U (McQueen/Troop) to approve the agenda for this meeting.


 

IV.                PUBLIC COMMENTS

            Alex Zima stated his opposition to censoring myspace.com on campus because of its importance to the music business class.

           

V.         EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE REPORTS

 President’s Report

 

DPC—Estimated FTES target for this year and next year was discussed.  Cypress College’s FTES declined 10.42 percent.  Its growth projection for next year is 3.71 percent, but this is because the Summer FTES is being borrowed forward.  SCE has growth of 1.50 percent, and Fullerton College’s growth is 0 percent. Both college campuses believe that they will grow next year.

 

Dr. McGowan received a response from Dr. Hodge regarding the shared governance issue of adding a director to work groups.

 

M/S/U (Wilson/Powers) that the Senate Executive committee respond to the college President and indicate that  the Senate has discussed this issue at length and stands firm by its position under the constitution and Board Policy  that the college president must come to agreement with the Senate on the creation and modification of any committee.

 

The Directors of Research at both colleges have garnered information about local high school students.  Current research indicates that Fullerton College receives about 1,670 students from local high schools.

 

Dynamic fund information was sent out last week.  Applications are located on the J drive, and April 18 is the deadline for submission. The process for evaluating requests will be changed this year. The Senate President recommends that the proposal selection committee vote by closed ballot and that people not vote on their own division’s requests. It is also recommended that the details of each proposal requested be discussed in PAC.

 

A question was raised concerning the amount of dynamic fund money in terms of the amount of college carry-over money, given the current college carry-over of about $7 million. The $150,000 is carry-over money taken from the various divisions. 

 

Another question raised was concerning whether PAC evaluated the use of prior year allocations. The allocations are continuing, but to date there has been no announcement of any type of evaluation as to the effectiveness of the funds.

 

Treasurer’s Report

 

The Treasurer thanked those who provided the refreshments for this meeting and reported that the Senate has even less money than it had before.

 

VI.                CURRICULUM COMMITTEE REPORT

Dr. Eisner reported that Curricunet training went well last week. Testing will continue for the rest of the next semester.  Cypress College’s institutional learning outcomes were used as a basis for Fullerton College. This information was distributed to the Senators and a request made for divisional feedback. The questions for faculty to answer are (1) Do these seem appropriate?  Are there any changes that should be made?  (2)  Are there any outcomes that should be added?  (3) Do we need another category such as, “General Outcomes for all students”?


VII.       ELECTIONS

 

The following were election results:

 

Honors Program Advisory Committee Term 2005-2007

Robert Lundergan

Kelly Nelson-Wright

Bruce Henderson

 

Selection Committee for Director of Health Services

Lisa Campbell

Elias Dominguez

VIII.       LIAISON REPORTS

Associated Students

 

Jonathan Mayer presented a resolution on myspace.com. As a student representative, he indicated that a poll of the students found that a large majority of students did not want myspace.com blocked at the campus level, but that some controls in the Library would be appropriate.

United Faculty

The United Faculty representative indicated that Faculty will shortly receive a Salary Survey asking for their input on the current salary proposal from the District.

 

Adjunct Faculty United

No report.

 

IX.         UNFNISHED BUSINESS

 

            Deborah Ludford addressed the Senate on AP 3720.  Ms. Ludford explained that the policy was based on input from the three campus IS directors and that it reflects current practice. She indicated that the campus IS directors were to have discussed this policy with members of the college. Several Senators indicated that this was not done at Fullerton. She requested suggestions for the policy from the Senators. 

 

M/S/P (Eisner/M. Moore) that a subcommittee of the Senate go through the policy and make recommendations for changes. 

 

The Senators who will serve on this committee will be Chuck Ketter, Elise Donley, Marcus Wilson, Sally Moore, Pete Snyder, and Dale Craig. 

 

X.         OLD BUSINESS

 

M/S/P (Fitzsimmons/Wilson) that the Library staff resolve the issue of access to myspace.com with ACT and that there not be a campus-wide ban of the use of myspace.com.

 

The issue of Title V was again introduced in the Senate. A recommendation was made that this issue not be discussed until the Title V chairperson was present.


 

XI.     NEW BUSINESS

 

It was announced that all the faculty members serving on the Academic Computing Technology Oversight committee had resigned. The chairperson of this committee submitted a letter to the Senate indicating why he was resigning. One of the ACT Oversight members indicated that the ACT committee was not working as intended. ACT policies impacting instruction were not being brought through the committee and so, in the opinion of the faculty members on the committee, it was not serving its intended purpose.

 

Dr. Niccolai, who was attending the Senate meeting, responded by stating that none of the faculty issues were brought forward in the committee and that it is unfair to say that ACT did not address the issues. He also pointed out that PAC intended the committee to create a strategic plan for ACT and not provide a mechanism for faculty input to ACT policies and procedures that impact instruction.

 

Several Senators felt that faculty lacked input to ACT policies and procedures that impacted Instruction and that ACT support for instructional programs is marginal at best. A list of faculty concerns about the operation of ACT, which was solicited from the faculty after the last Senate meeting, was presented to the director of ACT. These issues included inadequate support for MacIntosh computer system, inadequate support for in-class demo stations, and concerns about network security. There was no response from ACT on particular concerns.

 

The sense of the Senate was that the purpose and role of an ACT oversight committee would be presented at the next PAC meeting. Most members of the previous ACT oversight committee indicated that they no longer wished to serve.

 

The Senate was presented with an information item concerning a proposal to develop guidelines for the institutionalism of programs. This proposal consisted of collecting information validating the value of the proposed program and criteria for program success.

 

A representative of classified personnel sought the support of the Senate in urging PAC to develop an objective formula for hiring new staff.  Discussion ensued.

 

An information item from the Accreditation Response Committee was presented. This committee is drafting the response to the recent accreditation findings. This response will be very short and will detail what steps have been taken to remedy the findings. The final version of this response will be brought back to the Senate. If any Senators have input for the committee, they can e-mail them to either of the Senate committee representatives (Dale Craig or Doug Eisner).

 

It was reported that the Equivalency Committee deciding on a new process for awarding faculty equivalence is still being worked on by a subcommittee of the three Senates. The new process will allow faculty more input into the process by allowing department faculty to review the material and let the department coordinator, who attends the meeting, present the department’s views on the equivalency being evaluated.

 

The meeting was adjourned at 5:03 p.m.

 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

/s/

 

Jane Troop, Secretary